Your browser doesn't support javascript.
Show: 20 | 50 | 100
Results 1 - 2 de 2
Filter
Add filters

Database
Language
Document Type
Year range
1.
Journal of Crohn's and Colitis ; 17(Supplement 1):i862-i863, 2023.
Article in English | EMBASE | ID: covidwho-2278149

ABSTRACT

Background: The SARS-CoV-2 pandemic has raised issues in the management of inflammatory bowel diseases (IBD). This study aimed to assess the efficacy of different anti-SARS-CoV-2 vaccines under different treatments in IBD patients and identify predictive factors associated with lower serological response, including anti-TNF drug levels. Method(s): A prospective, multicentre study of IBD patients was conducted following mRNA and non-mRNA anti-SARS-CoV-2 vaccination. Healthy control (HC) patients were enrolled to reduce bias. Baseline and week 14 samples were obtained following the second dose to assess the impact of conventional and biological treatments. Clinical and biochemical activity, serological response level, and anti-TNF drug levels were measured. Result(s): This study included 199 IBD (Table 1.;mean age, 40.9 +/- 12.72 years) and 77 HC participants. Most patients (76.9%) and all HCs received mRNA vaccines. Half of the IBD patients were on biological treatment (Table 2.;anti-TNF 68.7%). Combined immunomodulation and biological treatment were associated with lower serological response (Figure 1.;p<0.001), and mRNA vaccination promoted better antibody levels (p<0.001). Higher adalimumab levels caused lower serological response (p=0.006). W8 persistence of anti-SARS-CoV-2 level was equal in IBD and HC groups (Figure 2.;p>0.05). Vaccination had no impact on disease activity. Conclusion(s): Anti-SARS-CoV-2 vaccination is considerably efficacious in IBD patients, with mRNA vaccines promoting better antibody levels. The negative impact of combined biological treatment, especially with high adalimumab drug levels, on serological response to vaccination should be considered. Although mid-term durability of vaccination is encouraging, more data are needed to expand existing understanding on this issue.

2.
Journal of Crohn's and Colitis ; 16:i425, 2022.
Article in English | EMBASE | ID: covidwho-1722336

ABSTRACT

Background: Inflammatory bowel disease potentially elevates the risk of infections, furthermore, disease activity and medical treatment(s) can increase the risk as well. However, both international data and recent studies do not confirm these preliminary conceptions regarding the SARS-CoV-2 infection. In addition, a number of studies have reported that less antibodies are produced against the virus in IBD patients. In January, 2021, the vaccination campaign has begun in Hungary as well, however, questions have been raised about the effectiveness and safety of the vaccine. Methods: In this multicentre study, we assessed the prevalence and risk factors of COVID-19 infection, the willingness to receive COVID-19 vaccine and the efficacy of vaccination among IBD patients receiving biological therapy, based on a cross-sectional questionnaire-based study. To assess safety and antibody response to COVID-19 vaccines, we conducted a prospective study in the same Hungarian IBD centers. IgG antibody was quantified to SARS-CoV-2 spike protein and nucleocapsid, 1 week before and after the first vaccine and, 4 and, 8 weeks after the second vaccinane, respectively. Results:, 472 patients were enrolled in the first part of our study. SARSCoV- 2 infection was confirmed in, 16.9% of patients. Wearing gloves and masks were found to be effective in preventing infection (p=0.02;p=0.005), avoidance of communal areas had no effect on infection rates. Male sex increased the risk (p=0.008) of viral infection. Based on subjective complaints, UC patients had a worse disease course (p=0.002). Biological therapies did not increase the risk of infections. Patients vaccinated with mRNA vaccine had a significantly higher spike protein antibody titer one month after the second vaccination (p=0.004) compared to other vaccine types (Sinopharm©, Sputnik V©, Astra Zeneca©). Seropositivity was detected in, 98% of patients. Sinopharm © vaccination triggered the lowest number of side effect (p<0.001). SARS-CoV-2 infection induced relapses more frequently than vaccinations. Conclusion: Face mask was the most effective preventive tool. The risk of infection was not increased by biological therapy, therefore therapy discontinuation is not justified. Almost every vaccinated patient developed seropositivity two month after vaccination independently from the type of the vaccine, however, spike protein antibody was significantly higher following mRNA vaccinations.

SELECTION OF CITATIONS
SEARCH DETAIL